The Real Black Power Movement
We are about to see the birth of a new class of committee barons. Black (and eventually Latino) congressmen from overwhelmingly Democratic districts have no need to fear defeat. Since 1992 African-Americans like Charlie Rangel and John Conyers have become among the most senior members of their party in the House. Their potential power was concealed by the fact that the Democrats were in the minority. But now they will be assuming control of major committees like Judiciary and Ways & Means. Control of these committees will give the Congressional Black Caucus disproportionate power in the House - their acquiescence will be required on every issue.
Will they be the tail that wags the dog of the Democratic majority? Not really. There were over 100 Dixiecrats in the old New Deal majority - nearly half the caucus. The CBC has only 40 or so. And while the old Dixiecrats were generally hostile to liberal legislation, representatives from majority-minority districts are among the most consistently progressive members in the House. But while they may not control the party the way the Democrats did, they will have enormous influence.
The Republicans tried to make an issue in the last campaign of (black) chairmen like Rangel if the Democrats took power. To which I can only say - it's about time.
2 Comments:
-
This certainly presents the Democrats with a dilemma. On one hand they can retain majority-minoty districts that will help minority lawmakers climb the ranks of seniority until virtually all committees are chaired by minorities. The problem is that, as you note here, http://third-estate.blogspot.com/2006/08/whatever-happened-to-white-southern.html, creating such districts inevitably increases democratic margins in those districts by spreading out democratic support everywhere else, thus producing the minority-majority Republican Party of the past 12 years. Or, we can flatten out those majority-minority districts in order to create more democratic seats, thereby robbing minorities of the ability to climb the seniority ladder. It seems the Democrats must be satisfied either with a temporary majority that is controlled by the most liberal elements of the country, or a long-term majority that is socially conservative but economically populist. I hope there is a way to resolve this dilemma in the Democrats' favor.
By Marriah, at 11:03 PM -
1) Not all cmmte will be chaired by minorites. Just more than the 10% that are in the House.
By Arbitrista, at 9:40 AM
2) These seats can be safe seats without being 60% majority-minority. I'd favor diluting them some. I'm just saying that this is one silver lining of the present system.
3) I fail to see what social conservatism or economic populism has to do with it.
Post a Comment
<< Home
:: permalink